rusefi.com

Re: OpenXC

2015-02-24T21:00:41

Seriously?

Do you ever really think about what you post before you click "submit"?

Statistics: Posted by abecedarian — Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:00 pm

Re: OpenXC

2015-02-20T11:11:54

Worthiness to post was based on visibility to primary developers. Back when you posted it, you gave it visibly to the primary developers. This time when I stumbled on it, I posted it to get visibility to the primary developers.

I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish with you mostly negative post and I posted it first comment. To me I read this as high probability of drama with little content. Can you please try to avoid drama inducing posts and focus more on value add posts.

Statistics: Posted by kb1gtt — Fri Feb 20, 2015 11:11 am

Re: OpenXC

2015-02-20T05:00:34

Thinking a bit more about this, I realized it sounded very familiar.

I posted about this over 2 years ago: Jan. 16, 2013- http://ecu.zeeff.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=214&sid=0b5f9992d5c61f970f5dec5527bde082 The article I linked to at Ford's site at the time is dead. However, https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2013/01/10/ford-openxc-platform-is-now-open-for-vehicle-data--customizable-.html works and is as much as I can remember is the same article I had linked to initially, relocated.

It was an interesting idea back then, mostly intended towards "instrumentation", as in provide the driver with information; there's no consideration for altering or tuning the engine parameters.

So I have to ask, if it wasn't interesting enough to comment on then, why is it worthy of comment now?

Statistics: Posted by abecedarian — Fri Feb 20, 2015 5:00 am

Re: OpenXC

2015-02-19T12:15:45

This reminds of OnStar... could be useful for telemetry purposes.

Statistics: Posted by klyttle — Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:15 pm

Re: OpenXC

2015-02-19T10:56:56

I doubt Frankenso could include this as a add-on module, but we did also create the more pins STM, as well other future options might make use of it.

However what I was thinking of is that it might be a software reference, which could potentially be integrated into rusEFI code. I'm not sure if that would help, but when it comes to OBDII messages it might be a handy reference. Or it might not, so I posted it here to get it some visibility.

Statistics: Posted by kb1gtt — Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:56 am

Re: OpenXC

2015-02-19T04:57:28

More overhead for the processor to work with... and didn't you recently say something about the STM is running out of CS pins?

yep, you did... http://rusefi.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=805&start=10#p13878

Statistics: Posted by abecedarian — Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:57 am

OpenXC

2015-02-19T00:09:47

Interesting CAN vehicle interface found here http://openxcplatform.com/

Statistics: Posted by kb1gtt — Thu Feb 19, 2015 12:09 am