Search found 13 matches

by subnet
Sat Nov 08, 2014 6:02 pm
Forum: Your car & your engine
Topic: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype
Replies: 11
Views: 2651

Re: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype

just to clarify, since there is a cam sensor and a crank sensor on the engine there actually won't be a spare - we'd use both channels? Oh, now I get it :) Sometimes it would take up to four iterations before I get it, sorry :) Since you've pointed at the cam sensor, this case yes - we will use bot...
by subnet
Sat Nov 08, 2014 5:27 pm
Forum: Your car & your engine
Topic: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype
Replies: 11
Views: 2651

Re: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype

I'm here for the sciences based objectives, so you have caught my eye :) I've heard of cracking, but not with gas / petro. I think I understand the concept to be like this, using a cavity in the hot exhaust you squirt fuel into this hot oxygen deprived cavity. Which then heats the fuel to be very h...
by subnet
Sat Nov 08, 2014 5:06 pm
Forum: Your car & your engine
Topic: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype
Replies: 11
Views: 2651

Re: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype

russian wrote:
subnet wrote:here is what the crankshaft reluctor wheel looks like Image
Perfect, I'll get the code ready :)
awesome thank you :)
by subnet
Sat Nov 08, 2014 5:04 pm
Forum: Your car & your engine
Topic: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype
Replies: 11
Views: 2651

Re: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype

do i still connect 1 to 2 on JP04 & JP05 or should i do something else? Technically you would only need one of them, but let's connect both so that we have a spare channel. the fancy VR chip is an overkill for just a hall sensor but since you have it why not use it :) just to clarify, since there i...
by subnet
Sat Nov 08, 2014 4:13 pm
Forum: Your car & your engine
Topic: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype
Replies: 11
Views: 2651

Re: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype

RusEFI To start with I will be using RusEFI only as part of the fuel delivery system, delivering fuel according to standard operational parameters in conjunction with custom parameters that are necessary with this design. First step is getting a working tachometer into rusEfi dev console. Do you kn...
by subnet
Thu Nov 06, 2014 4:41 am
Forum: Your car & your engine
Topic: 98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype
Replies: 11
Views: 2651

98 S10 Blazer 4x4 Vortec 4.3 V6 - Vapor Prototype

Hi All, It’s time to introduce myself and my project properly since my frankenso board has arrived (thanks for the great job done on it Andrey) and many of the other parts that I need are here or on their way - I'm excited to move forward! So to everyone in the RusEFI community – hi! I look forward ...
by subnet
Sat Oct 18, 2014 4:37 pm
Forum: Software
Topic: rusEfi simulator
Replies: 16
Views: 8978

Re: rusEfi simulator

hello russian, i have problem with setting up virtual COM/TCP port. i followed the steps given in your video but LAN status is shown error. i don't know what i did wrong. can you please check the attached figure and help me out? thanks and regards, vincent when i was trying to get this working i ha...
by subnet
Mon Oct 13, 2014 12:06 pm
Forum: Hello World
Topic: frankenso vs frankenstein
Replies: 15
Views: 3071

Re: frankenso vs frankenstein

russian wrote:Sounds like that's a perfect use case for the flexible outputs which are coming pretty soon
time_since_boot < 2 AND coolant < 60
smth like that :)
love it, perfect!

re the simulator sounds great i've got the day off so i can focus on that when you're available, i'll add you on skype. thanks!
by subnet
Sun Oct 12, 2014 7:42 pm
Forum: Hello World
Topic: frankenso vs frankenstein
Replies: 15
Views: 3071

Re: frankenso vs frankenstein

thank you that's great to hear. i tried running the simulator so that i could have a look at the gui and see what's possible currently etc however unfortunately it doesn't seem to work on windows 8; unfortunately my laptop is windows 8. is this a known issue or is it something that only i am experie...
by subnet
Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:55 am
Forum: Hello World
Topic: frankenso vs frankenstein
Replies: 15
Views: 3071

Re: frankenso vs frankenstein

thanks for the answers russian, and puff unless i'm misunderstanding the options and schematic shown at http://rusefi.com/wiki/index.php?title=Manual:Hardware_Frankenso_board i would have 12 analog inputs available, 12 injector outputs, and 6 ignition outputs, and the crank input - and not quite sur...
by subnet
Sun Oct 05, 2014 6:26 pm
Forum: Hello World
Topic: frankenso vs frankenstein
Replies: 15
Views: 3071

Re: frankenso vs frankenstein

Ok thanks that does help. So last questions then before I make my decision: 1. about the tracing issue with the frankenso board - that won't be a problem if i order an assembled board since the board assembler won't misunderstand the tracing is that correct? 2. the sdcard that's built into the frank...
by subnet
Sun Oct 05, 2014 3:03 pm
Forum: Hello World
Topic: frankenso vs frankenstein
Replies: 15
Views: 3071

Re: frankenso vs frankenstein

Thank you, are the tracing issues documented somewhere here? Is there a reason I would want one of the boards over the other aside of the integration? Also although if they're close to the same it might not make a difference which one, can one of them be set up to output an SSR or relay signal while...
by subnet
Sun Oct 05, 2014 3:29 am
Forum: Hello World
Topic: frankenso vs frankenstein
Replies: 15
Views: 3071

frankenso vs frankenstein

hi all, i'm eyeing up these boards to use on a custom fi system for my truck. the things i'm looking at most are fuel maps, spark maps, and i'm wondering if there's any integration with o2 for afr on either of these boards (or if not, if there's a way to integrate that). does anyone have more inform...