rusefi.com

Just an FYI, the attached STL files have now been tested and confirmed to work and fit.

OK I see, so its more a case of being able to overide the afr table to do power enrichment above a certain tps point. That makes sense. For clarity, using the afr table to tune the labmda for normal running conditions and run lamdba one everywhere you don't have to use rich mixture for cooling (lik...

That's come together really nicely.

OK I see, so its more a case of being able to overide the afr table to do power enrichment above a certain tps point. That makes sense. For clarity, using the afr table to tune the labmda for normal running conditions and run lamdba one everywhere you don't have to use rich mixture for cooling (like...

OK, you got me curious, what are you planning to do that would need the afr target decoupled from the ve table and other fueling?

Case has been getting updated to rev 0.3/0.4 tonight so it has extra back space for the capacitor and the front USB as an option.
Will hopefully have some decent progress and a new STL package tomorrow.

by the look of it this is an M73 rather than the M73tu so it is using 3x 88pin connectors.

This one is the reason I was sure Andrey's was 88pin but turned out to be 134pin.

There is a change on the M62 V8 and M73 V12 sometime in the 90s from the 88 pin to the 134.

It will only take 2 or 3 people wanting one to make it worth me whipping up a batch of 5pc here in the UK. Edit - Actually if you are happy to have a rev 0.3 board without knock detection then I have a pair of boards here now and would be happy to let one go. I would just have to program and test it...

You lucky that you are using an M73 so we have a fair bit of knowledge on these between a few people on the forum. I gather your install is relatively unique but that should not matter too much. For general information then the wiki is the best place to go. https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/wiki If y...

Based on your user name I am assuming your UK based, if there are a few more UK people interested then it might make some sense for me to look into arranging a UK batch.

Hi James.

Is this for the Countach rep?

I think the first known issue to report may be that the bluetooth in broken in this build.
Only a minor thing as it's not used much but still an issue for those that use it. This is obviously fixed in the daily builds.

This month is going to be the start of us making a bit more noise about our software releases. We have been doing some release builds for some time (regularly since 2019) but it seems not everyone is aware of them. So with that said rusEFI presents it's August 2020 firmware release. https://github.c...

Our august release candidate is now available at the link below: https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/releases/tag/20200803 We have had releases for a while but it seems people were not aware of them so this month is the first time we are trying to make a bit more of an announcement of it. Hopefully in ...

Just a general FYI, I am working on the framework for implementation and what code I am able to write so that it will only need integration from someone that knows the firmware better.

97 f150 is likely eec-iv, which we have a breakout board for the mustang version.
Would have to check the pin out and keying though.

I would recommend three improvements: silkscreen, silkscreen and silkscreen. On both sides. I am stunned. Normally it would be LEDs :P Though in this case some LEDs for some of the outputs could be done with some jumpers if you wanted to be able to connect a visual indication of a channel working.

Well I am glad I made a mistake and ordered the SMD ones with my last BOM, that resulted in me getting a bunch of these on next day.

https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/usb-connectors/1225097/

Genuine question, is the list unclear? Could it be improved?

The other problem we have seen with Bosch ICs is reliable supply. It is either dodgy Chinese supply or chips removed from OEM hardware.

I'm a little confused as they are all listed? See below. 1-- which pin does the crankshaft sensor go? Variable Reluctance #1 negative? or DIGITAL 1 Digital trigger/switch input ? You have VR sensor so: ## White 35 Pin 776231-2 | 5 | VR1 pos | vr | Variable Reluctance #1 positive | ## Black 23 Pin 77...

I think getting a stm32f407 discovery is probably going to be your best option.

While rusEFI might work with other STM chips there are so many variation that we just cannot be sure any chips other than the officially supported ones will work.

also, anybody know how the IDLE AIR is handled on the BMW? i have nissan throttle bodies with nothing built in for idle air. Idle air on the BMW is normally done with a Bosch 3 wire (duel circuit) IAC valve. I am not sure if the V12 used the ETB for idle, Andrey may be able to confirm. You may be a...

okay i am wiring up the engine now... so a few questions 1-- which pin does the crankshaft sensor go? Variable Reluctance #1 negative? or DIGITAL 1 Digital trigger/switch input ? 2-- camshaft sensor. .. same?? 3-- coolant temp sensor? pin # ? 4-- throttle body.. 2 of them... 5-- gas pedal.. 6-- MAP...

I'm using the registered version of TS. The following picture is an example what I mean for the Ignition advance of my MS2 powered C18XEL. It would be nice to have such tuning maps for rusEFI. 3D.PNG There is a little tick box in the top right corner of the maps that should put it into 3d mode. Can...

Hi Thomas. I can probably answer most of these for you and the good news is that most of these things refer to features that have been updated or improved and the documentation has not caught up yet. So going from the top: (no knock processing, no WB-controller and Bluetooth onboard) - Andrey has co...

Welcome to the madhouse.

Another C++ developer on board would be a massive help.

One thing you may be able to do is get a donor ECU and remove the plugs. A 1l vauxhall ECU is worth nothing in the UK, you can pick them up for £20 on ebay. Forget using an ECU as a donor, this is a ME7.x based ECU so it's a funny non-standard internal setup without a PCB. I believe one of our memb...

That's not actually surprising.

When I raised the question of timing accuracy at work the consensus was 0.5 degree at 6000 was plenty good enough and that anything tighter may just be a statistical improvement and little gain in practice.

*wave* I work within a university/research institute and we have exactly the same issues. The modern ECUs are so complex we can spend as much time working around the ECU as performing the test program. We have had some discussions about using rusEFI for some of the future test benches or cheaper stu...