I made some changes to your tune and uploaded the file here. Have fun with it.
As I said- you're well on your way. We'll have this baby running better than stock in no time!
BTW: I didn't touch your ignition table, but it seems very conservative to me. Do you have reliable access to 93 octane fuel? If so, I think it would be OK for you to run my (fairly) aggressive table. It's from a '99 with a squaretop, so a significantly different engine. If you decide to use it, I'll send it to you, but listen for knock- that table has never been run on a 1.6! But on the plus side, I'd guess you can make 5 more hp with it, if it doesn't knock
Did you manage to get your temp sensor calibrations sorted? Y
our IATs are constantly over 100*F- are you sure you got that right? I don't know anything about the air intake on the NA, so it may be correct. (Edit: ignore the IAT comment. Not sure what I was looking at, but your IATs look fine).
Also: Both your CLT and your IAT signals are noisy and move in tandem. Usually indicative of a weak GND. Maybe run a few more wires to ground the ECU? On the other hand your TPS signal seems fairly solid and I assume it's running off the same ground, so wtf?
(Edit: just realized, that the GND for the TPS is likely supplied by the ECU, while the IAT and CLT sensors use engine ground. So: Check engine ground!)
How did you calibrate your TPS? Are you sure you have it zeroed correctly? I'm asking because having an accurate TPS signal, especially at almost closed throttle, is very important for TPS-accel base enrichment. rusefi cuts off a signal that is below the 0 TPS level, so if your zero-point is too high, you may miss the first few degrees of throttle opening, making enrichment tuning in that range essentially impossible.
Your cranking rpm seems high- mine is set at 450rpm. Usually cranking is around 180-200rpm or so, so 450rpm is well into running territory. But I haven't touched it, not knowing if you have a reason for your value other than 'it works'