Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Hardware inside and outside of the ECU
Post Reply
blundar
contributor
contributor
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:38 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Github Username: blundar
Slack: Dave B.
Contact:

Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Post by blundar »

It isn't integrated but I ended up using many Vishay SIS414dn FETs in a design for injector drivers and had no issues aside from it being very hard to solder by hand (i.e. reflow oven required)
http://www.vishay.com/docs/66588/sis414dn.pdf

Things I liked:
-0.016ohm Rds w/ 2.5V Vgs !!! So 3.3V drive on Vgs ok!
-30W max TDP, 20A max continuous current, 30V max Vgs
-under $1 each single, closer to $0.30 on a reel
blundar
contributor
contributor
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:38 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Github Username: blundar
Slack: Dave B.
Contact:

Re: Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Post by blundar »

This is offered up as a suggestion towards moving towards 100% 3.3v
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14332
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Post by AndreyB »

blundar wrote:no issues aside from it being very hard to solder by hand (i.e. reflow oven required)
Bummer. Like no chance for DIY? Did you try soldering paste + soldering iron + some magnifying glass?
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
blundar
contributor
contributor
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:38 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Github Username: blundar
Slack: Dave B.
Contact:

Re: Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Post by blundar »

I built a reflow oven :) It was easy like that.
blundar
contributor
contributor
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:38 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Github Username: blundar
Slack: Dave B.
Contact:

Re: Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Post by blundar »

I used a STM32VLdiscovery board (I think? the one with the LCD display) for a reflow oven controller. That reminds me, I've been meaning to put that source and stuff up on github.
blundar
contributor
contributor
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:38 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Github Username: blundar
Slack: Dave B.
Contact:

Re: Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Post by blundar »

It also helps that there is a 80W CO2 laser at the local hackerspace. I can cut Kapton solderpaste stencils. Sometimes a little hard when getting smaller than about 2mil but doable. Still working on technique
User avatar
kb1gtt
contributor
contributor
Posts: 3758
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
Location: ME of USA

Re: Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Post by kb1gtt »

Once you breach into the mOHM range, the resistant heating is minimal. The over-voltage clamp is where most of the heat comes from at that point. I posted a really hacked page about it here with some QUCS simulations that show the voltage and current wave forms. From these wave forms you can look for the area under the curve to find the power that's being dissipated by different components. http://code.google.com/p/daecu/wiki/Injector_driver_theory I would caution about that package, if you cycle it though an automotive temperature range you'll likely find it fails. Or perhaps they made the chip have a similar expansion rate as the PCB, I'm not sure, however they are usually on a silicone wafer, so probably a blah expansion rate.

Wait a minute, that's not even clamped. That's just a generic diode. It would follow the curves at the top of the wiki page, and the heat would be dissipated in the injector not in the PCB. I don't recommend that kind of kick back mechanism, as noted on the wiki.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy :)
blundar
contributor
contributor
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:38 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Github Username: blundar
Slack: Dave B.
Contact:

Re: Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Post by blundar »

kb1gtt, do you do skype or gchat? I'd like to chat more about the contents of that wiki page. Every single OE ECU and standalone that I've ever had apart uses the diode/through injector method of dissipating. The method you put on the wiki sounds interesting, but the concern over long term exposure to high voltages is of a concern. Or do you want to just split a thread off here to discuss?
-Dave
blundar
contributor
contributor
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:38 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Github Username: blundar
Slack: Dave B.
Contact:

Re: Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Post by blundar »

after talking with kb1gtt, I'll concede that there are good reasons to use a protected MOSFET and this is something that should be explored. They're simultaneously very easy and very hard to find. All the majors (ST, ON Semi, Infineon, Vishay, ... ... ) seem to have decent parts. Once there are some decisions about what needs to be implemented, it seems like there will be no trouble finding quality automotive grade parts.
User avatar
abecedarian
Posts: 386
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 10:49 am

Re: Vishay SIS414dn low side switch

Post by abecedarian »

There is a point of demarcation between what works and what's necessary.
If this remains a 'hobby' type of thing, what works is all you need; if a commercial product might be involved, obligations are significant.

Don't get me wrong, I think setting the bar high at the onset forces everyone else to take notice of what the little guys are doing (no offense anyone).
And if the engineering is there in force, at the beginning, costs are known... and things are less likely to break.
You can lead the horticulture but you can't make them think.
Post Reply