Hardware inside and outside of the ECU
-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:17 am
This would really be a limiting factor pretty soon

I've just spent 5 minutes trying to figure out how to re-map ONE pin.
-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:15 am
or maybe a 144 chip - STM32F407ZG
-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:51 pm
-
mivaol
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:00 pm
Post
by mivaol » Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:29 am
А вот эта идея хороша возможно проще развести на готовой плате просто сразу два варианта под 100 и 176 ног.
Кто захочет использовать 100 будет впаивать 100 кто захочет 176 будет впаивать 176, кому по непонятным причинам нужно два будет впаивать сразу два например 176 ногий управляет впрыском а 100 ногий акпп
В переводе с гугла Translation with Google
But this idea is good it may be easier to dissolve willing to pay just once two options under the 100 and 176 feet.
Who wants to use a solder is 100 100 176 who will want to solder 176, who for some reason have to solder two will be just two legged eg 176 and 100 controls the injection legged automatic transmission
-
kb1gtt
- contributor

- Posts: 3489
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
- Location: ME of USA
-
Contact:
Post
by kb1gtt » Sun Jan 18, 2015 11:32 am
The 176 pin chip is flying lead which is much better about soldering and thermal expansion issues. I would expect solder paste and hot air for the bulk soldering. I would expect that you would put down the paste, then tach two pins with an iron. Once the chip was held rigid, you would use a re-flow oven or hot air gun to flow the remaining pins. If you have an excess in solder solder wick and an iron can such up the excess.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy

-
kb1gtt
- contributor

- Posts: 3489
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
- Location: ME of USA
-
Contact:
Post
by kb1gtt » Sun Jan 18, 2015 11:56 pm
I understand now. Seems google translate didn't work very well for this message. I looked at it and I think it could be a possibility, but it would be a fair bit of work. The TQFP_100 module seems to pretty much fit, I'm not sure if traces can be routed or not, but it has a good probability of working.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy

-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:06 pm
@ is wondering why BOOT0 network goes to NRST pin, and NRST network goes to BOOT0 pin.

-
Art_ELectro
- contributor

- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:17 am
- Location: Siberia
Post
by Art_ELectro » Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:36 pm
russian wrote:Also pin #171 PDR_ON - we probably need a 0 ohm resistor to VDD?
I think need to add jumper on board for 171 pin.
-
kb1gtt
- contributor

- Posts: 3489
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
- Location: ME of USA
-
Contact:
Post
by kb1gtt » Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:35 am
Boot0 and NRST were flipped in the 176 symbol I made. I corrected the symbol.
SM0805 added to PDR_ON. I copied a 1kohm. Should I update the schematic to say 0R? I tend to like 1k's for current limiting purposes. I don't know what that pin does so I'm not sure if current limiting is a good idea or not.
These should be pushed up to rusEFI repo shortly when russian get's to his PC.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy

-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Thu May 14, 2015 4:35 pm
Finally placed an order for this board!
Need someone in the US who would volunteer to solder the chip for me, I am hopeless with this small pitch

-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Mon Jun 08, 2015 2:20 am
Issue #1) on the back, battery holder overlaps five caps and one resistor
question #1) part number for FB1 is missing. How about HZ0805G471R-10?
-
kb1gtt
- contributor

- Posts: 3489
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
- Location: ME of USA
-
Contact:
Post
by kb1gtt » Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:03 am
Are these the conflicting resistors? Those are de-coupling caps, and they can probably be moved out of the way. The issue is that the silk screen doesn't match the real world, so I forgot there was an interference there.

- 176_battery_holder.PNG (30.82 KiB) Viewed 7174 times
On the referenced STM brain board, FB1 was DIGI,490-1054-6-ND
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy

-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Mon Jun 08, 2015 11:13 am
kb1gtt wrote:Are these the conflicting resistors?
Yes, and two more caps at the bottom edge of the holder.
kb1gtt wrote:On the referenced STM brain board, FB1 was DIGI,490-1054-6-ND
I have HZ0805G471R-10 / 240-2400-1-ND which we've used on the 100 pin stm32 board. I assume that one could be used, too. We might want to unify FBs on all our boards

-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:15 pm
-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:13 pm
I guess we need to connect BYPASS REG #48 somewhere, it's currently floating. Question is where do we pull it - up or down?
-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:15 pm
It worked as soon as I connected BYPASS_REG to GND!
3) BYPASS_REG to GND
4) back side silkscreen does not match front side silkscreen (multiple instances)

-
kb1gtt
- contributor

- Posts: 3489
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
- Location: ME of USA
-
Contact:
Post
by kb1gtt » Wed Jun 10, 2015 10:35 am
Why would they offer the bypass_reg on a pin? Is there any reason we would ever want to disable the internal regulator? I'm tempted to make this a jumper to GND, but then I don't see a need to ever change it, so I'm also tempted to hard wire to GND. So I wonder, why would we ever want to do something with this pin, other than grounding it?
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy

-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:12 am
Looks like a very special use-case to me: they do not have it in 100 and even 144 pin package, they were even calling this pin GND in the datasheet until rev 4!
-
kb1gtt
- contributor

- Posts: 3489
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
- Location: ME of USA
-
Contact:
Post
by kb1gtt » Wed Jun 10, 2015 5:10 pm
I'll ground it and keep things small.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy

-
kb1gtt
- contributor

- Posts: 3489
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
- Location: ME of USA
-
Contact:
Post
by kb1gtt » Thu Jun 11, 2015 9:40 am
Looks like the silk screen issues are on the back left side. When I copied and flipped a chunk of test like "PH3 PH2" it should have also been updated to "PH2 PH3" So the silk on the front is good, but there are some errors in R0.1 on the back left.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy

-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:46 pm
BTW USB connector works, I've got communication
-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:55 pm

but on this 176 board we have

out 100 pin board has the right pinout

-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:33 pm
-
kb1gtt
- contributor

- Posts: 3489
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
- Location: ME of USA
-
Contact:
Post
by kb1gtt » Wed Mar 09, 2016 2:35 am
This RAM chip has lots of potential, but also takes many IO. I wonder if a similar / smaller RAM chip could be found, or if much of these addresses could be ignored. Also can the IO pins be moved to other pins? The current pin out conflicts with the existing layout.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy

-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Wed Mar 09, 2016 2:42 am
By the way SDRAM is a feature of
http://www.st.com/web/en/resource/techn ... 071990.pdf which is a sibling of the chip from the first post in this thread, should be same exact pinout.
It does mention 8 bit bus
but open question if that applies to SDRAM
PF0 is the only pin option for FMC_A0 and PF3 is the only option for FMC_A2 etc unfortunately.
-
Suprazz
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:12 pm
Post
by Suprazz » Thu Mar 10, 2016 3:38 am
Is there really need for this amount of ram? It look way overkill...
-
russian
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9779
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
- Location: Jersey City
- Soldering skill: yes
- Coding skill?: yes
-
Contact:
Post
by russian » Thu Mar 10, 2016 3:47 am
Suprazz wrote:Is there really need for this amount of ram? It look way overkill...
Current 192Kb is 90% used (a lot of this is monitoring stuff)
Jumping from 192Kb to 8Mb for just a couple of bucks looks like a good deal. I hope to have some build-in auto-tune one day and that would require more RAM.