[info] electronic throttle body control ETB

It's all about the code!
Post Reply
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

mk e wrote:
Wed Jan 02, 2019 11:30 pm
http://gemellocattivo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8
Now back to ETB :)
Just forked the v12 thread to https://rusefi.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1499
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

E38 1998 BMW 750 has two stepped motors with four windings driving each throttle plate - 8 windings per throttle body. Would it be possible to combine four "cos" wires and four "sin" wires to drive each ETB with one VNH2SP30TR-E?

Image

Image

Image
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
User avatar
kb1gtt
contributor
contributor
Posts: 3758
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
Location: ME of USA

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by kb1gtt »

From the picture, I think no you cannot drive both from one driver. It appears to show the two are out of phase with each other. I think if you activate both, you'll fight with each other and have less effect than if you activated just one. I would wager that they allowed one motor to technically drive it, and the second one is semi-redundant. You could try driving it with only one of the motors and see what happens. I would suggest connecting the unused coils together, to prevent them from building up a charge.

I also suspect they step motor 1, then turn it off when they do motor 2. Most steppers are 100% on. However with 2 motors, motor 1 might only be on for around 50% of the time. The result is less heat in the motor driver, and less heat in the motor coils. I suspect that could be done like that as a method of micro-stepping with the slow transistors they had back in the late 90's.

Any how I suggest trying one driver, and see what happens. Also probably don't do it for very long, as it will likely get hot.

I think a long term solution is less easy than you might prefer. Perhaps you can do it with 2 drivers, with enable lines connected to the STM32. Same pulse and direction, but you add the enable lines to half step it.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy :)
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

The text on this picture mentions "two controllers" and "simultaneously". Also with the whole redundancy approach it has to be something really simple without inter-process synchronization.

I will start by trying one stepper with two sin wires connected together and two cos wires connected together and go from there.
Attachments
v12_etb.png
v12_etb.png (113.95 KiB) Viewed 30050 times
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
mck1117
running engine in first post
running engine in first post
Posts: 1493
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:05 am
Location: Seattle-ish

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by mck1117 »

I bet you can wire both steppers in parallel, and run them as a single stepper with double the torque, assuming the phases of each stepper are aligned. That loses you the redundancy of dual steppers, but saves the complexity for testing.

edit: looked closer at the diagram and re-read kb1gtt, it's not two steppers, it's a doubly wound single stepper. So it'll probably work if you use one set of windings (ie two pairs of wires), and ignore the other.
User avatar
kb1gtt
contributor
contributor
Posts: 3758
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
Location: ME of USA

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by kb1gtt »

If you ignore the other wires, I suggest connecting them together. Keep in mind there are magnetic fields, and these coils with out termination can potentially generate voltages. Those voltage could potentially exceed insulation, and cause damage.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy :)
puff
contributor
contributor
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:28 am
Location: Moskau

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by puff »

But from my experience with steppers, if you shorten the coil, it makes it harder to move the shaft, am I wrong?
User avatar
kb1gtt
contributor
contributor
Posts: 3758
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
Location: ME of USA

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by kb1gtt »

Its a break feature which means if you move fast it absorbs energy. I doubt he'll move it fast enough to care. My bigger concern is for him to set the amps of the stepper driver. That's a thermal issue, and I don't know how many amps he should be setting it to. It would be helpful if he had an operational system which he could measure.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy :)
960
contributor
contributor
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:22 am
Location: Norway

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by 960 »

For E-Throttle I suggest you to develop for the most widely used system.

In 2001 Bosch started using MC33186 in all ecu's.

From 2005 - They have used TLE7209-2R.

It's basically the same, even pin-compatible.

The system uses two Pedal-sensors and two Throttle-motor position-sensors.

I see the same pedal etc. are used in lots of cars.
960
contributor
contributor
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:22 am
Location: Norway

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by 960 »

For the pedal position one of the signals are

0.4 - 2v

The other signal:

0.7 - 4.1

The Throttle position sensor:

0,7 - 4.3

The second:

4.3 - 0.7
960
contributor
contributor
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:22 am
Location: Norway

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by 960 »

The PierBurg Throttle-body are basically the same for all cars as well.

The same parts in different shapes:


https://www.google.com/search?q=PIERBURG+Throttle+Body&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiit7rTj7ngAhWqxKYKHblhDvIQ_AUIDigB&biw=800&bih=354
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

Tl;DR: large-scale movement is great, fine movements are not so great.

Status update:

0) Just a reminder that my test ETB is slightly open by default. To be more specific, default position is 4% open. With some electricity it can go to 0% which would reduce idle air flow. Our end goal is to
have some precise control in this 0-4-8% range assuming this is how we will control idle air without any additional valves.
1) now with direction control pins. If command duty cycle below 0, flip direction pins and use abs(command duty) as duty cycle. Fun fact is that my bench test VNH2SP30 chip seems to be 5v logic, I have no clue how did I get any results previously while I was driving it directly from stm32. Now using Frankenso 5v outputs to drive VNH2SP30.
2) now with feedforward curve. Some default curve attached based on mck1117's default curve. I have no idea how to make a better curve more suitable for my ETB.
3) now with explicit iTerm limits in addition to overall PID limits since I saw iTerm running away.

I have my rusEfi console command the same test sequence of throttle positions and accumulate standard deviation of control error. This would theoretically allow me to objectively compare different settings. Great news is that I even get somewhat repetitive results!

This picture shows two runs on the test sequence.
etb_default_results.png
etb_default_results.png (97.57 KiB) Viewed 29912 times
Above picture with current default values.
etb_default_settings_20190302.png
etb_default_settings_20190302.png (73.54 KiB) Viewed 29912 times
etb_default_curve_20190302.png
etb_default_curve_20190302.png (90.91 KiB) Viewed 29912 times
Following random different settings seem to be better for fine movements closer to idle position, did I get lucky here?
etb_better_results.png
etb_better_results.png (99.03 KiB) Viewed 29912 times
etb_better_settings_20190302.png
etb_better_settings_20190302.png (73.55 KiB) Viewed 29912 times
etb_better_curve_20190302.png
etb_better_curve_20190302.png (91.33 KiB) Viewed 29912 times
More on test sequence:
2019-03-02 15_26: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 4.0:27
2019-03-02 15_26: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 4.0:27
2019-03-02 15_26: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 6.0:27
2019-03-02 15_26: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 8.0:27
2019-03-02 15_26: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 6.0:27
2019-03-02 15_26: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 4.0:27
2019-03-02 15_27: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 2.0:27
2019-03-02 15_27: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 0.0:27
2019-03-02 15_27: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 10.0:28
2019-03-02 15_27: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 6.0:27
2019-03-02 15_27: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 30.0:28
2019-03-02 15_27: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 50.0:28
2019-03-02 15_27: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 70.0:28
2019-03-02 15_27: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 100.0:29
2019-03-02 15_28: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 50.0:28
2019-03-02 15_28: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 70.0:28
2019-03-02 15_28: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 4.0:27
2019-03-02 15_28: EtbTestSequence: ETB test sequence done!
2019-03-02 15_28: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 0.0:27
2019-03-02 15_28: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 4.0:27
2019-03-02 15_28: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 4.0:27
2019-03-02 15_29: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 6.0:27
2019-03-02 15_29: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 8.0:27
2019-03-02 15_29: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 6.0:27
2019-03-02 15_29: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 4.0:27
2019-03-02 15_29: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 2.0:27
2019-03-02 15_29: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 0.0:27
2019-03-02 15_29: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 10.0:28
2019-03-02 15_29: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 6.0:27
2019-03-02 15_29: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 30.0:28
2019-03-02 15_30: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 50.0:28
2019-03-02 15_30: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 70.0:28
2019-03-02 15_30: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 100.0:29
2019-03-02 15_30: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 50.0:28
2019-03-02 15_30: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 70.0:28
2019-03-02 15_30: EngineState: confirmation_set mock_pedal_position 4.0:27
2019-03-02 15_31: EtbTestSequence: ETB test sequence done!

See also https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/issues/494

Raw logs attached
Attachments
console_logs.7z
(311.27 KiB) Downloaded 488 times
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

Since I have very little clue how to tune this growing space of parameters I am now trying random parameters on the same test sequence. Not great so far. Yellow line result at the end of the test is the thing I want to be as small as possible.
Attachments
random.png
random.png (100.4 KiB) Viewed 29906 times
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
User avatar
kb1gtt
contributor
contributor
Posts: 3758
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
Location: ME of USA

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by kb1gtt »

Can you create a list of output values over time, such that you can simply play back this list of outputs and see how fast you can possibly get. Basically you look at areas and simply decide to increase or decrease the output and see what you get. Once you know what your output should be under certain conditions, then you can try to make your algorithm generate the same outputs.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy :)
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

kb1gtt wrote:
Sat Mar 02, 2019 10:31 pm
Can you create a list of output values over time, such that you can simply play back this list of outputs and see how fast you can possibly get. Basically you look at areas and simply decide to increase or decrease the output and see what you get. Once you know what your output should be under certain conditions, then you can try to make your algorithm generate the same outputs.
I have no idea what you are suggesting :( Is this assuming that for each throttle position, there is one specific DC duty cycle?
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
User avatar
kb1gtt
contributor
contributor
Posts: 3758
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
Location: ME of USA

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by kb1gtt »

Lets say you have an 1 by 1000 table of numbers. This table number will be copied to your PWM output. Lets say that each mS you copy one of these numbers to the PWM output. You can then adjust each the output once for every mS. You then play these output values and see how well it was at getting to your desired position. If it has not reached your desired position, you can then adjust the values, play them again, and see if they have gotten any better.

Lets say you start with the ETB at 4%, and your PWM duty starts at 0% and your first desired position is 50%. In your table might have 100, 75, 50, 50, 50, etc.

Then you start the program. It starts at 0% duty, but immediately the duty goes to 100%, then 1mS later it goes to 75%, then at 3mS it goes to 50% and stays there. You then look at your log file, and you see if you are getting to your desired target quickly. You can then adjust the number and play it again and see how it reacts. Once you have adjusted these numbers until you are happy with how fast it reacts, you know what numbers your control algo should be generating. At this point you can adjust your algo until it makes these numbers.

I think that by doing this, you'll get a better understanding or gut feel for the effects of hysteresis and signal delays.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy :)
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

For now I have implemented a Monte Carlo (if that's the right term here?) - my software is simply trying different random parameters and I programmatically pick best set.

First successful run, sorted by last column 'result' which is the metric of control quality for given test scenario:

Code: Select all

Sat Mar 02 18	50	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	32	pFactor	3.02	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.19	result	61.75430199
Sat Mar 02 17	51	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	22	pFactor	3.35	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.13	result	63.30895293
Sat Mar 02 17	50	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	72	pFactor	2	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.19	result	64.00471867
Sat Mar 02 19	8	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	42	pFactor	2.6	iFactor	0.23	dFactor	0.16	result	65.80440286
Sat Mar 02 19	9	50 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	76	pFactor	3.84	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.14	result	66.73304504
Sat Mar 02 18	41	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	0	pFactor	3.93	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.12	result	66.93453638
Sat Mar 02 18	15	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	60	pFactor	3.99	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.07	result	68.01089967
Sat Mar 02 17	56	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	84	pFactor	1.13	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.29	result	68.42649213
Sat Mar 02 18	12	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	99	pFactor	2.55	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.21	result	69.32302424
Sat Mar 02 19	2	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	17	pFactor	3.33	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.08	result	70.12480014
Sat Mar 02 18	44	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	79	pFactor	3.96	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.25	result	71.2091067
Sat Mar 02 19	56	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	90	pFactor	3.52	iFactor	0.18	dFactor	0.06	result	71.7108843
Sat Mar 02 18	27	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	70	pFactor	1.78	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.04	result	72.64242933
Sat Mar 02 18	47	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	20	pFactor	3.6	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.09	result	73.06019117
Sat Mar 02 19	20	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	2	pFactor	3.41	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.29	result	73.11698062
Sat Mar 02 17	53	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	34	pFactor	3.91	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.15	result	74.71511228
Sat Mar 02 20	0	52 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	53	pFactor	2.82	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.05	result	74.92574877
Sat Mar 02 19	42	51 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	83	pFactor	2.75	iFactor	0.2	dFactor	0.26	result	76.88702074
Sat Mar 02 20	14	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	92	pFactor	3.55	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.08	result	76.97680382
Sat Mar 02 18	26	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	4	pFactor	3.25	iFactor	0.08	dFactor	0.22	result	77.28637418
Sat Mar 02 20	11	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	38	pFactor	3.09	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.11	result	77.86908669
Sat Mar 02 19	51	52 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	4	pFactor	2.11	iFactor	0.18	dFactor	0.05	result	78.09483792
Sat Mar 02 19	30	51 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	81	pFactor	2.51	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.17	result	79.02709928
Sat Mar 02 19	45	51 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	13	pFactor	2.84	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.29	result	79.25462865
Sat Mar 02 19	32	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	15	pFactor	2.61	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.29	result	79.27676282
Sat Mar 02 19	50	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	4	pFactor	3.58	iFactor	0.07	dFactor	0.09	result	80.00909269
Sat Mar 02 17	48	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	14	pFactor	3.08	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.06	result	80.36636733
Sat Mar 02 19	29	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	83	pFactor	3.29	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.29	result	80.71865992
Sat Mar 02 18	56	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	72	pFactor	2.83	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.21	result	80.9093029
Sat Mar 02 18	48	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	15	pFactor	1.7	iFactor	0.21	dFactor	0.12	result	81.54213336
Sat Mar 02 19	27	51 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	85	pFactor	2.13	iFactor	0.27	dFactor	0.14	result	82.13582556
Sat Mar 02 18	33	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	33	pFactor	2.09	iFactor	0.24	dFactor	0.05	result	82.14328771
Sat Mar 02 19	44	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	22	pFactor	3.39	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0	result	82.38224158
Sat Mar 02 17	45	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	26	pFactor	1.56	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.16	result	82.58208825
Sat Mar 02 19	41	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	81	pFactor	2.73	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.19	result	82.61504193
Sat Mar 02 20	5	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	95	pFactor	1.23	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.17	result	82.8731455
Sat Mar 02 18	51	50 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	96	pFactor	2.67	iFactor	0.21	dFactor	0.05	result	83.59444093
Sat Mar 02 20	6	52 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	75	pFactor	1.9	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.23	result	83.6595167
Sat Mar 02 17	57	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	17	pFactor	2.22	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.16	result	83.66532006
Sat Mar 02 18	11	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	68	pFactor	2.23	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.16	result	84.07996545
Sat Mar 02 18	8	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	38	pFactor	3.29	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.29	result	84.4232816
Sat Mar 02 19	57	52 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	52	pFactor	3.2	iFactor	0.21	dFactor	0.24	result	85.50245353
Sat Mar 02 19	48	51 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	8	pFactor	3.37	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.14	result	86.98500334
Sat Mar 02 19	18	50 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	44	pFactor	1.19	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.2	result	87.47912462
Sat Mar 02 18	54	50 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	57	pFactor	1.12	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.24	result	87.62219576
Sat Mar 02 19	38	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	93	pFactor	1.06	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.02	result	88.126511
Sat Mar 02 18	36	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	52	pFactor	3.6	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.21	result	89.32130212
Sat Mar 02 19	15	50 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	11	pFactor	2.53	iFactor	0.06	dFactor	0.11	result	89.63951632
Sat Mar 02 18	18	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	42	pFactor	3.24	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.04	result	91.11612474
Sat Mar 02 19	36	51 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	37	pFactor	1.79	iFactor	0.11	dFactor	0.22	result	91.17151809
Sat Mar 02 17	59	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	66	pFactor	2.6	iFactor	0.24	dFactor	0.26	result	91.71580264
Sat Mar 02 18	38	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	2	pFactor	3.07	iFactor	0.2	dFactor	0.02	result	91.7713249
Sat Mar 02 18	9	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	41	pFactor	3.7	iFactor	0.11	dFactor	0.02	result	91.81991106
Sat Mar 02 18	32	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	76	pFactor	1.2	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.28	result	92.02527994
Sat Mar 02 19	11	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	81	pFactor	1.41	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.07	result	92.46333918
Sat Mar 02 19	14	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	53	pFactor	2.02	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.29	result	92.96845508
Sat Mar 02 19	53	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	88	pFactor	1.87	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.15	result	93.11964916
Sat Mar 02 19	0	50 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	73	pFactor	2.83	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.18	result	93.20671923
Sat Mar 02 18	17	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	34	pFactor	2.9	iFactor	0.06	dFactor	0.26	result	93.48675189
Sat Mar 02 19	3	50 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	18	pFactor	1.76	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.15	result	93.76070124
Sat Mar 02 18	39	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	27	pFactor	1.61	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.17	result	94.01090733
Sat Mar 02 20	3	52 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	85	pFactor	2.86	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.25	result	94.45967849
Sat Mar 02 19	35	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	41	pFactor	3.34	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.23	result	94.51562621
Sat Mar 02 18	6	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	7	pFactor	1.67	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.21	result	94.67262593
Sat Mar 02 19	17	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	18	pFactor	3.15	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.01	result	94.95547943
Sat Mar 02 18	23	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	52	pFactor	1.06	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.05	result	95.15842649
Sat Mar 02 19	6	50 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	4	pFactor	3.51	iFactor	0.06	dFactor	0.02	result	96.3347408
Sat Mar 02 18	30	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	10	pFactor	1.26	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.15	result	96.85889892
Sat Mar 02 18	0	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	45	pFactor	2.4	iFactor	0.23	dFactor	0.08	result	96.91509279
Sat Mar 02 19	5	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	37	pFactor	1.83	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.1	result	97.18067982
Sat Mar 02 19	23	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	50	pFactor	1.56	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.24	result	97.28501268
Sat Mar 02 18	35	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	6	pFactor	1.41	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.25	result	97.43084849
Sat Mar 02 18	21	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	40	pFactor	1.95	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.15	result	97.6873371
Sat Mar 02 19	21	51 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	93	pFactor	3.56	iFactor	0.06	dFactor	0.18	result	97.8430605
Sat Mar 02 20	8	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	68	pFactor	2.61	iFactor	0.23	dFactor	0.19	result	97.84446588
Sat Mar 02 18	20	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	47	pFactor	2.27	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.16	result	98.68799975
Sat Mar 02 18	14	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	62	pFactor	1.16	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.21	result	98.89687351
Sat Mar 02 19	59	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	44	pFactor	1.59	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.26	result	99.75972145
Sat Mar 02 18	2	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	31	pFactor	1.55	iFactor	0.27	dFactor	0.06	result	102.4570084
Sat Mar 02 18	57	50 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	73	pFactor	2.38	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.04	result	103.3895305
Sat Mar 02 18	5	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	48	pFactor	1.48	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.01	result	104.5244684
Sat Mar 02 19	26	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	81	pFactor	2.4	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.06	result	104.9428772
Sat Mar 02 20	12	52 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	5	pFactor	1.61	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.19	result	107.0159811
Sat Mar 02 17	47	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	75	pFactor	1.77	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.06	result	108.5267687
Sat Mar 02 18	3	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	55	pFactor	1.11	iFactor	0.18	dFactor	0.22	result	108.7761223
Sat Mar 02 18	24	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	80	pFactor	1.64	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.15	result	114.2846976
Sat Mar 02 19	12	50 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	66	pFactor	3.62	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.16	result	114.7237401
Sat Mar 02 17	54	48 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	89	pFactor	1.53	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.07	result	122.6711496
Sat Mar 02 18	29	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	29	pFactor	1.59	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.03	result	126.5477698
Sat Mar 02 18	42	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	83	pFactor	3.97	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.04	result	129.5190879
Sat Mar 02 19	54	52 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	83	pFactor	1.12	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.2	result	129.8413629
Sat Mar 02 20	9	52 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	1	pFactor	2.58	iFactor	0.02	dFactor	0.14	result	136.3775182
Sat Mar 02 19	39	51 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	58	pFactor	1.96	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.05	result	138.9593131
Sat Mar 02 18	53	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	52	pFactor	1.41	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.09	result	139.6049513
Sat Mar 02 20	2	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	70	pFactor	1.9	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.13	result	146.1518518
Sat Mar 02 18	45	49 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	80	pFactor	1.01	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.08	result	153.3320802
Sat Mar 02 19	47	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	31	pFactor	2.05	iFactor	0.02	dFactor	0.12	result	154.3836483
Sat Mar 02 17	44	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	19	pFactor	3.61	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.13	result	164.1268476
Sat Mar 02 19	33	51 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	80	pFactor	1.58	iFactor	0.02	dFactor	0.26	result	212.5413146
Sat Mar 02 18	59	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	63	pFactor	3.87	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.2	result	225.4833084
Sat Mar 02 19	24	51 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	 mcstats	offset	74	pFactor	1.55	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.09	result	515.2170929
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

Results above seem to show that larger iFactor values are winning which means that for next iteration I should allow a wider iFactor range. Lowest iFactor sets are performing worst at least on this scenario.
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
puff
contributor
contributor
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:28 am
Location: Moskau

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by puff »

doesn't the airflow passing through the throttle body affect the force required to move the throtle?
User avatar
kb1gtt
contributor
contributor
Posts: 3758
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
Location: ME of USA

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by kb1gtt »

With the I factor getting larger, you increase the chances of integral windup issues. At minimum you should have limits on how much your integral term can effect the final result. If in your testing you discover your Integral term is typically 5% of your output, you should have a limit set to limit you to say 6%.

It is also common to have a band around your target, such that the integral term is not calculated unless you are with in something like 10% of your target. If you are father away than 10% from your target, then your integral term is 0. This also minimizes the effects of integral wind up.

Also with the I factor getting larger, keep an eye out on your phase delay. You might be getting to your target nicely, but it also might happen like 1 second after the command.
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy :)
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

Just as a baseline we have OEM ETB on a real vehicle



Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

Why did I suddenly stopped posting amazing Monte Carlo results? Because I've started to have functional issues.

Why did I suddenly started having functional issues? It's unclear, but the fact that I can no longer move the disconnected throttle body by hand might be hinting at the fact that I have fried it :(

@ I believe you've just swapped same ETB on your vehicle? Please do not throw away the old part...
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
puff
contributor
contributor
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:28 am
Location: Moskau

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by puff »

but that's a good reason to take it apart, have a look at it guts?
User avatar
kb1gtt
contributor
contributor
Posts: 3758
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
Location: ME of USA

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by kb1gtt »

A likely source is caused by small resistance in your connections. If you have even around 0.1 ohms in your connections, it can generate in excess of 300V internal to the motor. This high internal voltage is typically what causes motors to burn up. If you know your motors inductance, you probably know the capacitance of your power supply, you could calculate the ball park resonant frequency.

https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/tools/tank-circuit-resonance-calculator/
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy :)
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

kb1gtt wrote:
Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:24 pm
A likely source is caused by small resistance in your connections.
I have stripped wires screwed into 5mm terminals. What actions are necessary to change the outcome in your opinion?

Actually here's a video of what I am playing with right now.

Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
User avatar
kb1gtt
contributor
contributor
Posts: 3758
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:42 am
Location: ME of USA

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by kb1gtt »

It is hard to see, but I think you have your ETB wires directly screwed into the PCB. That is likely good enough, but solder would be better. I also think I see some fat-ish wires going off to the right of the screen. I suspect that is your power supply. This likely has large capacitors in it, which are connected to a fairly large-ish inductor. If you could use a power supply with a low front end capacitance that would likely help. Hmmm, how to find a low capacitance power supply.

What amps does the ETB consume normally? Can you put a multi meter in series with your power supply and tell me what amps it is consuming?
Welcome to the friendlier side of internet crazy :)
User avatar
AndreyB
Site Admin
Posts: 14292
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:28 am
Location: Jersey City
Github Username: rusefillc
Slack: Andrey B

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by AndreyB »

New test script contains both small and large movements. Attached is the picture of the best settings out of 250 attempts. Anyone to do any analysis on the full results pretty please? I am blind to data :(

Code: Select all

Mon Mar 04 00	37	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	29367.358	mcstats	offset	80	pFactor	1.07	iFactor	0.18	dFactor	0.24	result	151.4070387
Sun Mar 03 17	19	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	3066.084	mcstats	offset	12	pFactor	1.05	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.21	result	160.6204592
Sun Mar 03 23	10	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	24139.242	mcstats	offset	68	pFactor	1.61	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.28	result	167.0229363
Sun Mar 03 18	31	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	7387.177	mcstats	offset	38	pFactor	1.82	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.12	result	167.8733752
Mon Mar 04 00	7	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	27566.75	mcstats	offset	53	pFactor	1.05	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.27	result	167.888015
Sun Mar 03 23	28	25 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	25221.879	mcstats	offset	61	pFactor	1.36	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.06	result	169.9110653
Sun Mar 03 16	34	08 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	365.315	mcstats	offset	44	pFactor	1.39	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.15	result	173.4172781
Mon Mar 04 02	31	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	36210.051	mcstats	offset	32	pFactor	1.2	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.29	result	173.8724299
Mon Mar 04 03	16	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	38911.036	mcstats	offset	76	pFactor	1.07	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.24	result	176.4551811
Mon Mar 04 03	43	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	40531.64	mcstats	offset	37	pFactor	1.13	iFactor	0.02	dFactor	0.19	result	176.5036938
Sun Mar 03 17	7	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	2345.903	mcstats	offset	84	pFactor	1.03	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.2	result	178.7370302
Mon Mar 04 03	10	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	38550.867	mcstats	offset	29	pFactor	1.08	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.12	result	179.2610675
Sun Mar 03 19	55	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	12428.436	mcstats	offset	31	pFactor	1.93	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.1	result	184.4757887
Sun Mar 03 23	52	29 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	26665.61	mcstats	offset	59	pFactor	1.1	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.21	result	186.2242139
Mon Mar 04 00	31	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	29007.241	mcstats	offset	7	pFactor	1.61	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.2	result	198.3568048
Mon Mar 04 01	31	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	32608.612	mcstats	offset	20	pFactor	1.07	iFactor	0.02	dFactor	0.05	result	198.3813464
Sun Mar 03 19	40	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	11528.212	mcstats	offset	0	pFactor	1.39	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.18	result	201.6290868
Mon Mar 04 03	52	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	41071.78	mcstats	offset	49	pFactor	1.91	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.24	result	203.5248564
Mon Mar 04 01	43	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	33328.996	mcstats	offset	0	pFactor	1.84	iFactor	0.02	dFactor	0.24	result	209.6745594
Mon Mar 04 02	58	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	37830.635	mcstats	offset	42	pFactor	1.25	iFactor	0.07	dFactor	0.22	result	220.0704742
Mon Mar 04 02	43	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	36930.3	mcstats	offset	98	pFactor	1.15	iFactor	0.21	dFactor	0.23	result	230.9123796
Sun Mar 03 18	58	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	9007.566	mcstats	offset	28	pFactor	1.21	iFactor	0.07	dFactor	0.12	result	233.4680353
Sun Mar 03 18	37	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	7747.261	mcstats	offset	92	pFactor	1.11	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.21	result	235.114762
Sun Mar 03 18	28	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	7207.136	mcstats	offset	44	pFactor	1.91	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.16	result	236.5074579
Sun Mar 03 19	7	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	9547.739	mcstats	offset	53	pFactor	1.25	iFactor	0.06	dFactor	0.17	result	240.5716512
Sun Mar 03 23	16	23 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	24499.721	mcstats	offset	32	pFactor	1	iFactor	0.11	dFactor	0.08	result	244.0486027
Mon Mar 04 00	28	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	28827.131	mcstats	offset	31	pFactor	1.04	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.29	result	251.4492467
Sun Mar 03 23	22	24 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	24860.832	mcstats	offset	71	pFactor	1.13	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.22	result	254.8550219
Mon Mar 04 01	16	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	31708.322	mcstats	offset	24	pFactor	1.22	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.18	result	257.4230483
Sun Mar 03 23	37	26 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	25763.355	mcstats	offset	64	pFactor	1.36	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.05	result	273.87937
Sun Mar 03 22	40	16 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	22333.219	mcstats	offset	92	pFactor	1.22	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.21	result	282.9368249
Sun Mar 03 21	22	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	17649.632	mcstats	offset	43	pFactor	1.27	iFactor	0.06	dFactor	0.08	result	287.9169548
Mon Mar 04 04	1	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	41611.925	mcstats	offset	66	pFactor	1.59	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.27	result	288.4843646
Sun Mar 03 23	55	29 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	26846.465	mcstats	offset	98	pFactor	1.23	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.21	result	300.5057393
Sun Mar 03 20	37	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	14949.009	mcstats	offset	65	pFactor	1.65	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.27	result	318.768954
Sun Mar 03 17	16	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	2886.039	mcstats	offset	29	pFactor	1.09	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.14	result	319.8133594
Sun Mar 03 18	10	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	6126.861	mcstats	offset	49	pFactor	1.46	iFactor	0.06	dFactor	0.27	result	332.3743627
Sun Mar 03 21	13	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	17109.498	mcstats	offset	40	pFactor	1.91	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.07	result	335.1025225
Mon Mar 04 01	46	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	33509.047	mcstats	offset	91	pFactor	2.31	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.1	result	335.8812127
Mon Mar 04 02	4	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	34589.408	mcstats	offset	62	pFactor	1.31	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.02	result	342.737285
Sun Mar 03 22	37	15 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	22152.231	mcstats	offset	97	pFactor	1.5	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.07	result	350.8608502
Sun Mar 03 23	46	28 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	26305.199	mcstats	offset	17	pFactor	2.58	iFactor	0.02	dFactor	0.05	result	352.2939463
Mon Mar 04 00	22	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	28467.036	mcstats	offset	70	pFactor	1.44	iFactor	0.08	dFactor	0.11	result	353.0634278
Mon Mar 04 00	52	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	30267.669	mcstats	offset	65	pFactor	1.68	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.1	result	355.6172246
Mon Mar 04 01	19	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	31888.387	mcstats	offset	64	pFactor	1.75	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.25	result	355.7400283
Sun Mar 03 19	31	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	10988.093	mcstats	offset	49	pFactor	1.94	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.28	result	356.0719407
Sun Mar 03 22	25	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	21430.576	mcstats	offset	56	pFactor	2.22	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.29	result	357.345554
Sun Mar 03 20	16	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	13688.743	mcstats	offset	26	pFactor	1.4	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.09	result	357.3531618
Sun Mar 03 17	37	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	4146.342	mcstats	offset	2	pFactor	3.17	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.19	result	358.0577468
Sun Mar 03 19	43	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	11708.251	mcstats	offset	49	pFactor	2.71	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.28	result	358.6503135
Sun Mar 03 16	37	08 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	545.361	mcstats	offset	22	pFactor	3.35	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.22	result	360.3906056
Mon Mar 04 02	25	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	35849.886	mcstats	offset	95	pFactor	2.36	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.23	result	360.6195689
Sun Mar 03 22	16	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	20890.421	mcstats	offset	26	pFactor	2.59	iFactor	0.08	dFactor	0.18	result	361.1385208
Sun Mar 03 18	19	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	6667.007	mcstats	offset	63	pFactor	1.23	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.29	result	362.1321321
Sun Mar 03 21	55	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	19630.129	mcstats	offset	83	pFactor	1.48	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0	result	362.2744551
Sun Mar 03 18	43	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	8107.344	mcstats	offset	68	pFactor	2.35	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.21	result	362.4153454
Sun Mar 03 19	4	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	9367.692	mcstats	offset	8	pFactor	2.73	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.17	result	362.5951515
Sun Mar 03 20	52	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	15849.227	mcstats	offset	5	pFactor	2.87	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.2	result	362.8913025
Mon Mar 04 00	10	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	27746.8	mcstats	offset	5	pFactor	1.63	iFactor	0.02	dFactor	0	result	362.9001241
Mon Mar 04 02	22	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	35669.757	mcstats	offset	7	pFactor	3.01	iFactor	0.07	dFactor	0.03	result	365.961849
Mon Mar 04 00	16	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	28106.926	mcstats	offset	8	pFactor	3.33	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.24	result	367.1035949
Sun Mar 03 21	10	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	16929.452	mcstats	offset	41	pFactor	1.56	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.04	result	367.2094289
Sun Mar 03 21	1	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	16389.337	mcstats	offset	82	pFactor	1.98	iFactor	0.23	dFactor	0.08	result	368.8065926
Mon Mar 04 01	55	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	34049.189	mcstats	offset	84	pFactor	3.26	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.18	result	368.8658673
Mon Mar 04 01	7	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	31168.109	mcstats	offset	59	pFactor	3.22	iFactor	0.18	dFactor	0.14	result	369.6916313
Mon Mar 04 00	49	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	30087.622	mcstats	offset	88	pFactor	2.84	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.07	result	370.1134686
Mon Mar 04 04	4	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	41791.994	mcstats	offset	17	pFactor	2.92	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.2	result	370.1845306
Sun Mar 03 19	1	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	9187.654	mcstats	offset	99	pFactor	2.56	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.09	result	370.2316939
Sun Mar 03 18	49	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	8467.44	mcstats	offset	57	pFactor	1.76	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.16	result	370.4777169
Sun Mar 03 20	55	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	16029.264	mcstats	offset	50	pFactor	2.39	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.21	result	370.6165863
Sun Mar 03 22	19	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	21070.469	mcstats	offset	95	pFactor	2.65	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.04	result	370.8169103
Sun Mar 03 18	16	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	6486.964	mcstats	offset	43	pFactor	1.53	iFactor	0.27	dFactor	0.29	result	370.9105487
Sun Mar 03 17	43	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	4506.454	mcstats	offset	28	pFactor	2.67	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.09	result	370.9346577
Mon Mar 04 01	49	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	33689.093	mcstats	offset	49	pFactor	3.31	iFactor	0.2	dFactor	0.03	result	371.1870513
Sun Mar 03 18	55	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	8827.523	mcstats	offset	69	pFactor	2.21	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.19	result	371.9626184
Sun Mar 03 19	10	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	9727.784	mcstats	offset	33	pFactor	2.77	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.02	result	372.7638416
Sun Mar 03 21	43	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	18909.947	mcstats	offset	40	pFactor	2.25	iFactor	0.07	dFactor	0.22	result	373.2839271
Mon Mar 04 03	31	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	39811.413	mcstats	offset	23	pFactor	3.5	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.11	result	373.424823
Mon Mar 04 03	40	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	40351.601	mcstats	offset	22	pFactor	3.89	iFactor	0.21	dFactor	0.17	result	373.5952533
Mon Mar 04 03	49	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	40891.742	mcstats	offset	9	pFactor	2.6	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.18	result	373.5991433
Mon Mar 04 00	34	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	29187.305	mcstats	offset	94	pFactor	2.46	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.15	result	374.2246957
Mon Mar 04 03	58	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	41431.864	mcstats	offset	45	pFactor	2.95	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.19	result	374.2736207
Mon Mar 04 03	19	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	39091.091	mcstats	offset	11	pFactor	3.17	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.19	result	375.1389077
Sun Mar 03 20	49	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	15669.187	mcstats	offset	47	pFactor	3.06	iFactor	0.23	dFactor	0.13	result	375.8078801
Sun Mar 03 20	7	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	13148.603	mcstats	offset	3	pFactor	2.42	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.2	result	376.568539
Sun Mar 03 16	46	08 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	1085.515	mcstats	offset	22	pFactor	3.56	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.14	result	377.0269973
Sun Mar 03 17	34	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	3966.299	mcstats	offset	62	pFactor	3.19	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.13	result	377.6243736
Sun Mar 03 16	31	08 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	185.261	mcstats	offset	76	pFactor	3.8	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.28	result	378.5733133
Sun Mar 03 17	46	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	4686.498	mcstats	offset	65	pFactor	3.65	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.25	result	378.6485257
Mon Mar 04 02	28	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	36029.974	mcstats	offset	43	pFactor	3.95	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.15	result	378.7826848
Sun Mar 03 19	34	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	11168.13	mcstats	offset	59	pFactor	2.36	iFactor	0.11	dFactor	0.25	result	379.2779159
Sun Mar 03 17	13	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	2705.99	mcstats	offset	57	pFactor	3.99	iFactor	0.24	dFactor	0.16	result	379.6832216
Sun Mar 03 17	28	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	3606.212	mcstats	offset	28	pFactor	3.45	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.08	result	379.9335011
Sun Mar 03 21	19	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	17469.585	mcstats	offset	75	pFactor	3.44	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.04	result	380.8412718
Sun Mar 03 17	52	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	5046.585	mcstats	offset	40	pFactor	3.17	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.29	result	381.0692995
Sun Mar 03 18	1	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	5586.716	mcstats	offset	79	pFactor	2.83	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.02	result	381.3436109
Mon Mar 04 00	19	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	28286.989	mcstats	offset	62	pFactor	2.96	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.06	result	381.8062341
Mon Mar 04 03	1	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	38010.693	mcstats	offset	1	pFactor	3.29	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.16	result	382.0196166
Sun Mar 03 17	10	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	2525.948	mcstats	offset	62	pFactor	2.57	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.28	result	382.1558881
Sun Mar 03 22	1	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	19990.212	mcstats	offset	55	pFactor	3.11	iFactor	0.21	dFactor	0.1	result	382.3341637
Mon Mar 04 02	19	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	35489.661	mcstats	offset	84	pFactor	2.79	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.24	result	382.3732018
Mon Mar 04 00	1	29 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	27206.6	mcstats	offset	81	pFactor	3.32	iFactor	0.11	dFactor	0.19	result	382.8077545
Mon Mar 04 02	13	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	35129.571	mcstats	offset	52	pFactor	3.9	iFactor	0.07	dFactor	0.05	result	382.9221644
Sun Mar 03 18	40	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	7927.307	mcstats	offset	92	pFactor	3.89	iFactor	0.18	dFactor	0.06	result	383.7012927
Sun Mar 03 18	22	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	6847.046	mcstats	offset	41	pFactor	3.47	iFactor	0.2	dFactor	0.16	result	383.9407124
Sun Mar 03 19	52	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	12248.394	mcstats	offset	91	pFactor	3.48	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.05	result	384.377088
Sun Mar 03 20	28	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	14408.894	mcstats	offset	20	pFactor	2.86	iFactor	0.2	dFactor	0.22	result	384.4543551
Sun Mar 03 22	31	14 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	21790.72	mcstats	offset	27	pFactor	2.85	iFactor	0.18	dFactor	0.17	result	384.9245877
Mon Mar 04 02	10	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	34949.534	mcstats	offset	46	pFactor	2.74	iFactor	0.23	dFactor	0.28	result	385.0073859
Sun Mar 03 23	19	23 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	24679.824	mcstats	offset	6	pFactor	3.06	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.18	result	385.5170143
Sun Mar 03 23	7	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	23958.347	mcstats	offset	2	pFactor	3.35	iFactor	0.08	dFactor	0.13	result	386.0406104
Sun Mar 03 19	25	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	10627.995	mcstats	offset	96	pFactor	2.99	iFactor	0.27	dFactor	0.09	result	386.2679512
Sun Mar 03 22	52	18 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	23055.197	mcstats	offset	40	pFactor	2.4	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.29	result	386.8490782
Sun Mar 03 22	34	14 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	21970.773	mcstats	offset	83	pFactor	2.42	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.02	result	387.0040947
Mon Mar 04 03	46	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	40711.677	mcstats	offset	79	pFactor	3.64	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.05	result	387.1283683
Mon Mar 04 01	28	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	32428.542	mcstats	offset	17	pFactor	1.56	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0	result	387.6575447
Mon Mar 04 01	34	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	32788.691	mcstats	offset	23	pFactor	3.18	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.08	result	387.6932099
Mon Mar 04 01	22	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	32068.444	mcstats	offset	1	pFactor	3.34	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.08	result	387.8536454
Sun Mar 03 19	37	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	11348.171	mcstats	offset	71	pFactor	1.6	iFactor	0.24	dFactor	0.25	result	388.3248747
Mon Mar 04 02	7	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	34769.48	mcstats	offset	65	pFactor	3.02	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.19	result	388.5095449
Mon Mar 04 03	22	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	39271.168	mcstats	offset	66	pFactor	2.17	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.2	result	388.675324
Sun Mar 03 17	49	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	4866.543	mcstats	offset	97	pFactor	3.11	iFactor	0.24	dFactor	0.25	result	388.9438147
Sun Mar 03 16	55	08 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	1625.67	mcstats	offset	2	pFactor	3.45	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.04	result	388.9598354
Sun Mar 03 16	43	08 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	905.463	mcstats	offset	74	pFactor	3.29	iFactor	0.24	dFactor	0.09	result	388.9704342
Mon Mar 04 00	40	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	29547.437	mcstats	offset	59	pFactor	3.15	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.09	result	388.9865751
Sun Mar 03 21	28	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	18009.739	mcstats	offset	64	pFactor	3.29	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.2	result	389.061538
Sun Mar 03 21	31	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	18189.788	mcstats	offset	5	pFactor	3.65	iFactor	0.2	dFactor	0.25	result	389.0963925
Sun Mar 03 21	52	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	19450.09	mcstats	offset	77	pFactor	2.12	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.04	result	389.2858508
Mon Mar 04 01	52	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	33869.139	mcstats	offset	72	pFactor	3.98	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.05	result	389.353498
Mon Mar 04 01	10	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	31348.173	mcstats	offset	49	pFactor	3.66	iFactor	0.18	dFactor	0.27	result	389.3558301
Mon Mar 04 00	58	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	30627.882	mcstats	offset	97	pFactor	2.61	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.16	result	389.4784692
Mon Mar 04 01	37	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	32968.746	mcstats	offset	16	pFactor	3.57	iFactor	0.2	dFactor	0.24	result	389.8189171
Mon Mar 04 01	1	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	30807.95	mcstats	offset	9	pFactor	3.98	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.09	result	390.2758021
Sun Mar 03 17	22	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	3246.127	mcstats	offset	13	pFactor	3.23	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.21	result	390.5244169
Mon Mar 04 03	28	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	39631.294	mcstats	offset	89	pFactor	1.7	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.13	result	391.002802
Sun Mar 03 18	25	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	7027.098	mcstats	offset	48	pFactor	2.24	iFactor	0.2	dFactor	0.08	result	391.094474
Sun Mar 03 21	58	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	19810.174	mcstats	offset	79	pFactor	3.12	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.02	result	391.1625107
Mon Mar 04 03	37	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	40171.511	mcstats	offset	40	pFactor	3.96	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.21	result	391.2935507
Sun Mar 03 19	16	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	10087.871	mcstats	offset	97	pFactor	3.51	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.13	result	391.3473331
Mon Mar 04 02	40	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	36750.249	mcstats	offset	50	pFactor	2.34	iFactor	0.21	dFactor	0.21	result	391.6647415
Sun Mar 03 21	16	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	17289.542	mcstats	offset	70	pFactor	3.42	iFactor	0.16	dFactor	0.29	result	392.1482503
Sun Mar 03 21	49	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	19270.044	mcstats	offset	66	pFactor	1.83	iFactor	0.11	dFactor	0.14	result	392.7156535
Sun Mar 03 21	37	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	18549.866	mcstats	offset	49	pFactor	2.71	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0	result	393.2555018
Mon Mar 04 01	13	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	31528.239	mcstats	offset	46	pFactor	3.87	iFactor	0.24	dFactor	0.29	result	393.3194117
Mon Mar 04 00	13	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	27926.86	mcstats	offset	57	pFactor	2.94	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.15	result	393.6487473
Sun Mar 03 22	58	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	23416.719	mcstats	offset	46	pFactor	3.02	iFactor	0.08	dFactor	0.19	result	393.7026566
Mon Mar 04 01	4	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	30988.025	mcstats	offset	9	pFactor	3.86	iFactor	0.24	dFactor	0.04	result	393.7341359
Sun Mar 03 16	49	08 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	1265.567	mcstats	offset	72	pFactor	2.88	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.03	result	394.3443134
Sun Mar 03 22	28	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	21610.661	mcstats	offset	41	pFactor	2.9	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.2	result	394.4796616
Mon Mar 04 03	55	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	41251.82	mcstats	offset	35	pFactor	2.37	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.08	result	394.5538098
Sun Mar 03 23	31	25 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	25402.425	mcstats	offset	76	pFactor	3.64	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.03	result	394.6116621
Mon Mar 04 03	4	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	38190.738	mcstats	offset	16	pFactor	2.96	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.03	result	395.1288364
Sun Mar 03 22	43	16 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	22513.523	mcstats	offset	75	pFactor	3.45	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.06	result	395.3103047
Sun Mar 03 18	52	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	8647.486	mcstats	offset	30	pFactor	2.94	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.01	result	395.5194113
Sun Mar 03 23	4	21 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	23777.775	mcstats	offset	77	pFactor	2.29	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.29	result	395.7199665
Sun Mar 03 20	1	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	12788.52	mcstats	offset	40	pFactor	1.94	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.08	result	395.8380018
Sun Mar 03 23	49	28 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	26485.301	mcstats	offset	64	pFactor	2.34	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.25	result	395.8409784
Mon Mar 04 01	40	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	33148.922	mcstats	offset	23	pFactor	3.34	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.1	result	395.9910525
Mon Mar 04 00	46	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	29907.564	mcstats	offset	21	pFactor	3.06	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.14	result	396.0276141
Sun Mar 03 17	58	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	5406.671	mcstats	offset	94	pFactor	1.87	iFactor	0.08	dFactor	0.07	result	396.4048668
Sun Mar 03 22	22	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	21250.511	mcstats	offset	89	pFactor	2.01	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.27	result	396.5989869
Sun Mar 03 16	52	08 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	1445.623	mcstats	offset	97	pFactor	1.21	iFactor	0.27	dFactor	0.22	result	396.8315365
Mon Mar 04 03	13	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	38730.975	mcstats	offset	2	pFactor	3.01	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.15	result	397.0171141
Sun Mar 03 20	4	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	12968.564	mcstats	offset	96	pFactor	3.56	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.02	result	397.0205886
Mon Mar 04 02	1	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	34409.298	mcstats	offset	81	pFactor	2.27	iFactor	0.08	dFactor	0.05	result	397.1453369
Sun Mar 03 18	7	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	5946.804	mcstats	offset	29	pFactor	3.92	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.21	result	397.1764396
Sun Mar 03 19	22	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	10447.957	mcstats	offset	45	pFactor	2.87	iFactor	0.24	dFactor	0.01	result	398.821266
Sun Mar 03 23	58	29 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	27026.543	mcstats	offset	42	pFactor	2.22	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.02	result	399.0970066
Sun Mar 03 16	58	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	1805.75	mcstats	offset	28	pFactor	3.88	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.1	result	399.4594054
Sun Mar 03 20	31	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	14588.931	mcstats	offset	82	pFactor	3.58	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.22	result	399.807518
Sun Mar 03 22	55	19 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	23235.903	mcstats	offset	84	pFactor	3.99	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.17	result	399.8171077
Mon Mar 04 00	43	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	29727.489	mcstats	offset	1	pFactor	3.8	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.25	result	400.1633259
Sun Mar 03 21	25	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	17829.672	mcstats	offset	93	pFactor	1.08	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0	result	400.5137158
Mon Mar 04 01	58	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	34229.246	mcstats	offset	81	pFactor	2.63	iFactor	0.27	dFactor	0.01	result	400.7201934
Mon Mar 04 00	4	29 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	27386.661	mcstats	offset	30	pFactor	1.7	iFactor	0.26	dFactor	0.07	result	400.7775408
Sun Mar 03 20	10	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	13328.645	mcstats	offset	96	pFactor	2.95	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.16	result	401.2244306
Mon Mar 04 02	46	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	37110.379	mcstats	offset	12	pFactor	3.52	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.07	result	401.7674658
Sun Mar 03 22	4	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	20170.252	mcstats	offset	54	pFactor	3.85	iFactor	0.18	dFactor	0.1	result	401.7710058
Sun Mar 03 20	25	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	14228.856	mcstats	offset	62	pFactor	3.68	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.29	result	402.0873398
Mon Mar 04 04	7	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	41972.047	mcstats	offset	83	pFactor	2.33	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.1	result	402.4967783
Sun Mar 03 19	13	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	9907.83	mcstats	offset	10	pFactor	1.88	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.08	result	402.6554934
Sun Mar 03 20	13	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	13508.704	mcstats	offset	39	pFactor	2.1	iFactor	0.18	dFactor	0.14	result	404.2833212
Sun Mar 03 21	34	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	18369.825	mcstats	offset	40	pFactor	3.83	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.24	result	404.5393023
Mon Mar 04 03	25	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	39451.233	mcstats	offset	42	pFactor	1.96	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.09	result	404.9617259
Sun Mar 03 23	1	20 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	23597.607	mcstats	offset	16	pFactor	2.06	iFactor	0.21	dFactor	0.18	result	405.1043491
Sun Mar 03 19	28	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	10808.048	mcstats	offset	34	pFactor	2.09	iFactor	0.27	dFactor	0.02	result	405.9218859
Sun Mar 03 21	40	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	18729.904	mcstats	offset	40	pFactor	3.79	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.09	result	406.9570137
Sun Mar 03 18	46	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	8287.395	mcstats	offset	47	pFactor	1.63	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.17	result	407.2952605
Sun Mar 03 17	4	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	2165.857	mcstats	offset	98	pFactor	2.93	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.24	result	407.6197347
Mon Mar 04 03	7	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	38370.779	mcstats	offset	11	pFactor	3.53	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.13	result	408.0155947
Sun Mar 03 18	4	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	5766.757	mcstats	offset	27	pFactor	1.3	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.06	result	408.4723245
Sun Mar 03 22	10	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	20530.342	mcstats	offset	29	pFactor	1.13	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.02	result	408.478559
Sun Mar 03 17	40	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	4326.384	mcstats	offset	42	pFactor	3.62	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.07	result	408.8028795
Sun Mar 03 21	7	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	16749.417	mcstats	offset	94	pFactor	3.36	iFactor	0.06	dFactor	0.11	result	409.0360668
Sun Mar 03 22	13	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	20710.385	mcstats	offset	48	pFactor	1.32	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.14	result	409.2333277
Mon Mar 04 02	49	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	37290.423	mcstats	offset	0	pFactor	2.93	iFactor	0.21	dFactor	0.04	result	409.2604434
Sun Mar 03 20	43	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	15309.115	mcstats	offset	78	pFactor	3.42	iFactor	0.13	dFactor	0.09	result	409.7366501
Sun Mar 03 19	19	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	10267.91	mcstats	offset	25	pFactor	2.64	iFactor	0.09	dFactor	0.01	result	410.8469758
Sun Mar 03 17	25	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	3426.169	mcstats	offset	17	pFactor	1.5	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.14	result	411.4017732
Mon Mar 04 02	52	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	37470.495	mcstats	offset	87	pFactor	3.64	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.09	result	411.4888881
Sun Mar 03 23	25	24 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	25041.479	mcstats	offset	25	pFactor	1.15	iFactor	0.23	dFactor	0.02	result	411.928664
Sun Mar 03 17	31	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	3786.256	mcstats	offset	40	pFactor	3.87	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.16	result	411.9970574
Sun Mar 03 20	40	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	15129.053	mcstats	offset	96	pFactor	2.07	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.08	result	412.0791277
Sun Mar 03 21	4	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	16569.378	mcstats	offset	5	pFactor	2.82	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.08	result	412.2158026
Mon Mar 04 00	55	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	30447.734	mcstats	offset	85	pFactor	2.06	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.21	result	412.3386139
Sun Mar 03 20	34	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	14768.969	mcstats	offset	14	pFactor	3.3	iFactor	0.06	dFactor	0	result	412.7112722
Sun Mar 03 18	13	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	6306.912	mcstats	offset	8	pFactor	3.34	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.02	result	414.2935349
Mon Mar 04 02	55	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	37650.577	mcstats	offset	95	pFactor	3.86	iFactor	0.12	dFactor	0.1	result	414.8168154
Mon Mar 04 02	16	32 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	35309.614	mcstats	offset	98	pFactor	3.4	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.17	result	416.5808052
Sun Mar 03 22	7	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	20350.293	mcstats	offset	35	pFactor	3.79	iFactor	0.05	dFactor	0.29	result	417.0283248
Sun Mar 03 21	46	13 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	19090.008	mcstats	offset	25	pFactor	3.83	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.1	result	420.0146633
Sun Mar 03 22	49	17 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	22873.735	mcstats	offset	73	pFactor	2.92	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.13	result	420.91366
Sun Mar 03 19	49	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	12068.349	mcstats	offset	2	pFactor	1.72	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.21	result	422.6931202
Sun Mar 03 20	46	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	15489.152	mcstats	offset	25	pFactor	3.98	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.16	result	422.7713918
Sun Mar 03 20	19	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	13868.78	mcstats	offset	65	pFactor	2.78	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0	result	422.9530589
Sun Mar 03 23	43	27 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	26124.136	mcstats	offset	53	pFactor	3.93	iFactor	0.07	dFactor	0.11	result	424.3336633
Sun Mar 03 17	55	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	5226.626	mcstats	offset	72	pFactor	3.38	iFactor	0.2	dFactor	0.06	result	425.8013481
Sun Mar 03 23	40	27 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	25943.927	mcstats	offset	73	pFactor	2.46	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.18	result	428.3924302
Mon Mar 04 01	25	31 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	32248.499	mcstats	offset	68	pFactor	1.78	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.18	result	433.505655
Sun Mar 03 19	58	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	12608.474	mcstats	offset	28	pFactor	1.96	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.13	result	434.3284992
Sun Mar 03 23	13	22 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	24319.436	mcstats	offset	99	pFactor	3.62	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.25	result	435.2414507
Mon Mar 04 02	37	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	36570.155	mcstats	offset	65	pFactor	1.99	iFactor	0.11	dFactor	0.01	result	435.6552579
Sun Mar 03 23	34	26 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	25582.996	mcstats	offset	17	pFactor	1.73	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.09	result	436.9173872
Sun Mar 03 18	34	10 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	7567.214	mcstats	offset	52	pFactor	1.38	iFactor	0.25	dFactor	0.01	result	438.0152025
Mon Mar 04 03	34	34 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	39991.464	mcstats	offset	85	pFactor	3.97	iFactor	0.03	dFactor	0.15	result	440.3342029
Sun Mar 03 22	46	17 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	22693.685	mcstats	offset	15	pFactor	3.31	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.11	result	444.1699974
Sun Mar 03 16	40	08 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	725.412	mcstats	offset	55	pFactor	3.61	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.08	result	444.4554706
Sun Mar 03 20	22	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	14048.818	mcstats	offset	45	pFactor	2.52	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.2	result	445.6640605
Sun Mar 03 19	46	11 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	11888.288	mcstats	offset	52	pFactor	3.31	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.09	result	450.1616018
Mon Mar 04 00	25	30 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	28647.088	mcstats	offset	67	pFactor	1.88	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.14	result	464.0475839
Mon Mar 04 02	34	33 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	36390.106	mcstats	offset	39	pFactor	3.84	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.11	result	470.9389708
Sun Mar 03 17	1	09 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	1985.811	mcstats	offset	82	pFactor	3.78	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.06	result	473.9745847
Sun Mar 03 20	58	12 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	16209.3	mcstats	offset	78	pFactor	2.59	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.26	result	481.3195185
Mon Mar 04 05	19	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	46293.277	mcstats	offset	48	pFactor	3.82	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.06	result	1226.868544
Mon Mar 04 04	16	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	42512.206	mcstats	offset	79	pFactor	3.45	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.24	result	1226.950023
Mon Mar 04 04	58	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	45032.935	mcstats	offset	9	pFactor	3.06	iFactor	0.28	dFactor	0.25	result	1227.238962
Mon Mar 04 04	37	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	43772.622	mcstats	offset	46	pFactor	1.74	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.02	result	1227.671488
Mon Mar 04 04	28	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	43232.481	mcstats	offset	59	pFactor	2.65	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.23	result	1227.711205
Mon Mar 04 04	13	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	42332.166	mcstats	offset	94	pFactor	1.3	iFactor	0.08	dFactor	0.06	result	1227.76082
Mon Mar 04 05	16	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	46113.239	mcstats	offset	51	pFactor	2.57	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.14	result	1227.972317
Mon Mar 04 04	34	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	43592.565	mcstats	offset	31	pFactor	1.78	iFactor	0.15	dFactor	0.16	result	1228.454594
Mon Mar 04 04	19	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	42692.256	mcstats	offset	17	pFactor	2.5	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.05	result	1228.755883
Mon Mar 04 05	7	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	45573.079	mcstats	offset	19	pFactor	2.41	iFactor	0.14	dFactor	0.2	result	1228.929018
Mon Mar 04 05	10	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	45753.118	mcstats	offset	9	pFactor	3.38	iFactor	0.23	dFactor	0.23	result	1228.94825
Mon Mar 04 04	49	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	44492.804	mcstats	offset	37	pFactor	3.27	iFactor	0.11	dFactor	0.01	result	1228.952542
Mon Mar 04 05	13	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	45933.167	mcstats	offset	35	pFactor	2.52	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.22	result	1228.993682
Mon Mar 04 05	4	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	45393.038	mcstats	offset	18	pFactor	2.6	iFactor	0.01	dFactor	0.24	result	1229.376393
Mon Mar 04 04	46	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	44312.758	mcstats	offset	39	pFactor	2.17	iFactor	0.06	dFactor	0.26	result	1229.69497
Mon Mar 04 05	22	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	46473.346	mcstats	offset	5	pFactor	3.08	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.26	result	1230.199205
Mon Mar 04 05	1	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	45212.979	mcstats	offset	79	pFactor	2.34	iFactor	0	dFactor	0.26	result	1230.37922
Mon Mar 04 04	31	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	43412.526	mcstats	offset	70	pFactor	3.49	iFactor	0.29	dFactor	0.13	result	1230.551994
Mon Mar 04 04	40	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	43952.678	mcstats	offset	79	pFactor	2.86	iFactor	0.24	dFactor	0.13	result	1230.556959
Mon Mar 04 04	10	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	42152.121	mcstats	offset	18	pFactor	1.49	iFactor	0.22	dFactor	0.29	result	1230.562426
Mon Mar 04 04	22	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	42872.314	mcstats	offset	76	pFactor	2.82	iFactor	0.19	dFactor	0.15	result	1230.947413
Mon Mar 04 04	43	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	44132.717	mcstats	offset	79	pFactor	2.06	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.25	result	1231.077382
Mon Mar 04 04	25	35 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	43052.404	mcstats	offset	63	pFactor	1.85	iFactor	0.1	dFactor	0.21	result	1231.133348
Mon Mar 04 04	55	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	44852.898	mcstats	offset	59	pFactor	1.17	iFactor	0.04	dFactor	0.19	result	1231.343703
Mon Mar 04 04	52	36 EST 2019<EOT>	 postMessage EtbMonteCarloSequence	44672.855	mcstats	offset	27	pFactor	1.04	iFactor	0.17	dFactor	0.08	result	1232.668109
Second ETB has lasted 10 hours and seized at 4am this morning :( Just ordered a couple of small thermistors to glue to the next ETB.
Attachments
random2.png
random2.png (94.51 KiB) Viewed 29831 times
Very limited telepathic abilities - please post logs & tunes where appropriate - http://rusefi.com/s/questions

Always looking for C/C++/Java/PHP developers! Please help us see https://rusefi.com/s/howtocontribute
puff
contributor
contributor
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:28 am
Location: Moskau

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by puff »

you want to feed that data to some AI model?
puff
contributor
contributor
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:28 am
Location: Moskau

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by puff »

Speaking of that initial setup on BMW itself, did it use a separate valve for idle? The thing is, in cars with early ETBs, in addition to ETB itself they used a 'normal' stepper-based idle valve for some reason. Could it be so that those very ETBs wouldn't allow to control idle properly, so the engineers would keep both? The throttleangle/airvolume curve is too steep at low angles?

Wiki says, monte carlo is used for random processes, while controling throttle is not a random process? ziegler-nichols method doesn't work?

As for data, I am no way an expert, but I would pay attention to the difference between the two targets over time, and the way it affects the results. silly, but it could be, it requires different settings for different scenarios?
puff
contributor
contributor
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:28 am
Location: Moskau

Re: electronic throttle body control ETB

Post by puff »

these might be of interest:
In this project, the controller is built on National Instruments ’ configurable FPGA- FPGA -based based controller – the CompactRIO , and programmed with LabVIEW Real- Time , for a real- time, deterministic control. Various research has been reported on modeling and analysis of electronic throttle control. The intricate part of such system includes the hard nonlinearity of the pre- loaded spring, friction and unknown system parameters [2]. System identification is carried out with experimentation, data analysis an d understanding of system behaviour to determine the required parameters, following which, non- linear control design is carried out using input- output feedback linearization technique [2], [3]. In [4], nonlinear control of the throttle system is also propo proposed, sed, simulated and analyzed using SimMechanics and implemented with dSPACE RCP hardware, highlighting the friction compensator and joint stiction actuator, in addition to the nonlinear spring compensator, compe nsator, dead- zone and filtering. A discrete PI controller with w ith parameter scheduling, combined with feed- forward controller is simulated and tested in [5] but without friction or backlash compensation. A dual control algorithm is investigated in [6], using Xilinx- FPGA for process modeling and control implementation. implementation . For small initial throttle movement from zero, the system is regarded as linear and a large- signal control mode with PID controller is utilized. For all other instance, a small - signal control mode is employed, along with nonlinear friction, spring force compensation and air disturbance [6]
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/E-lectronic-throttle-body-ETB-BOSCH-DV-E5_fig4_269272013
Post Reply